US strategic interests and Bangladesh foreign policy

Tanbir Uddin Arman
It is an scrumptious paradox  that   the US , which   in  1971 sent its  the 7th fleet  to  the   Bay  of   Bengal  to desist India  from militarily  assisting the Bangladesh Liberation War,  now wants Bangladesh to host  the same fleet in order to   defend  its  strategic interests in the region. The question arises as to what factors now place Bangladesh on strategic radar of the US? The answer is short and easy to apprehend. That is – the geo-strategic setting and geopolitical implications of the country, which now induce the US to make it a strategic partner.Geographic location   of  Bangladesh  has made   it geopolitically   as well as geo-strategically significant  in South Asia   which  is now  at  the  center  of  international
politics  along  with Europe,  South-East  Asia  and  the already volatile Middle East. Bangladesh is  a claimant of sufficient attention  while  discussing  about rising importance of  the  South
Asia in global  politics  as it occupies some very  crucial part of the region. The country has now attracted America’s attention mainly for two reasons.  First one is the possibility of the
rise of religious extremism and  the other one is  the geo-strategic  setting of the  country  in South  Asia and on the edge of the Bay of Bengal.
Bangladesh is the third  and the second largest Muslim majority country  in the  world  and in the region respectively which make it sensitive to the US on the question  of religious  extremism. The tragic 9/11 has brought out dramatic shifts in the American foreign policy priorities. It has now added new dimensions to the American national security strategy. As a part of  national  security strengthening, they have tightened domestic immigration policy, and  declared ‘global war on terror’ which  mainly  aims at   the rise of  Islamic militancy throughout the  world. In an interview with “The Politic” journal,  Dan W. Mozena – the US Ambassador to Bangladesh- said that America’s strategic engagement with Bangladesh has changed following 9/11. The US  now  seeks to disrupt and tear down  those  who  threaten  the US  as well  as  its allies. Irrespective of its policy  during the
Bangladesh liberation war, the US  and  Bangladesh have now successfully  improved bilateral  relations in the   areas of economy, military, trade, and  countering global terrorism.
Recognising  Bangladesh as a democratic,  secular  state , US tries to  maintain friendly  ties  with it, and regards it as a critical strategic partner in South Asia.
Noticeably, the US does not as emphasise a ban on  Islamic  parties of the country, particularly Jamaat-e- islami and  Hefajot-e- islam  on their accusation of  recent flare-ups of violence in pre and post election phases as the EU does. The US now conceives of the probability of the rise of religious extremism throughout the country and especially in the region already plunged into violent extremism if any sanction be made on them. Democratisation throughout the world is another priority issue of the US foreign policy after the end of the cold war. For instance America’s uninterrupted collaboration with the recent Arab spring.
Therefore, the aforementioned issues –  religious extremism and democratisation – have  led   Bangladesh  to   surface  on  the tactical map of the  US and  its foreign policy.
A comprehensive apprehension of a country’s geographical setting helps one empathise the geo-strategic significance of the country. Bangladesh is almost entirely surrounded by India.
Importantly, its close geographical proximity with China oftentimes vexes the US in a great deal as China is considered as America’s strategic rival in Asia. Thus Bangladesh is a  close neighbor
of the two leading members of  BRICS,  an organization formed with a view to countering  the monopolising of power of the US, and  undoing her claim of “unipolarity”. In addition,
Bangladesh shares small but crucial land boundary with Myanmar which is a Chinese ally on the other hand.  It stands in the Bay of Bengal as a bridge between the two regional blocs- SAARC and ASEAN.
Bangladesh’s geographic setting on  the edge of the Bay of Bengal, and  its access to Indian ocean  entice the US into making it a strategic partner with a  view to safeguarding  its interests
vis-à-vis China, India, and  Myanmar, and  allure to establish naval base at  Bangladesh’s territorial seas.
However, the establishment of  the American naval fleet  in  the Bay of  Bengal  would  make  the  region much conflict prone between Washington and Beijing as the latter  does have same interests in the region. Moreover, the presence of the US 7th  fleet in
Bangladesh’s  territorial seas would  perhaps be taken as threats to Indian  national  security, and thus would be perceived to place  India in a disadvantageous position. Rijul Singh Uppal, an Indian  writer, expresses  concern over the  possibility that   the 7th  fleet would undermine the   Indian   current maritime dominance, and bring all Indian  missile test sites on  its eastern coast under  the direct surveillance of US  and China. Rijul suggests New Delhi has to have stab at urging Dhaka not to let  the US  park the 7th fleet at  Bangladesh’s territorial  sea in the Bay of Bengal.
China has over the decades improved its relations vis-à-vis the developing countries of Asia as well as Africa. Especially China’s relations with Bangladesh and Pakistan are notable. The US has now been worried about the recent development in Bangladesh- China bilateral relationship. Alongside Russia, China has also agreed  to  provide Bangladesh with assistances  for  peaceful
use of  nuclear  energy for medicine and  electricity generation along with military assistance. By expanding its  hands of cooperation, China wants  to maintain friendly relations with Bangladesh, and uphold its influence on the country. This development often
makes the US vexed since Bangladesh is an effective choice for securing its strategic interests in  the Bay of Bengal and  the Indian Ocean.
Aforementioned aspects of geo-strategic and geopolitical dimensions of Bangladesh help one empathise with its increasing significance in international politics. The country is now claimant of great appreciation in regional as well as global politics despite its diminutive figure in  the  global map. Geo-strategic and geopolitical implications of Bangladesh draw the attention of   not just the US but also of the other regional and global powers. The politicians and the bureaucrats should now reassess the country’s growing geo-strategic importance. They ought to prioritize the highest national interests over the regime interests while formulating policies vis-à-vis other countries. Generally Bangladesh’s foreign policy is formulated upon the basis of the regime interests. Consequently,  regime  changes drive  to  the frequent changes of foreign policy which  can  contribute less, and /or be proved ineffectual while dickering with other partners on  particular issues. Therefore, Bangladesh needs a very viable and consistent foreign policy for securing and upholding its national interests at the international level.
(Tanbir  Uddin  Arman is a research assistant at the Bangladesh Institute of Peace and Security Studies (BIPSS)